Rachel Dolezal: Agent of White Privilege or Black Pride Avatar-MOORISH EDITION
To be perfectly honest, I had NO IDEA who this woman was or where she came from prior to her ousting of being a, "White Woman" identifying herself to be, "Black". Both so-called Blacks and Whites were so upset then and even more so now since she is writing a book about race that will be published next year. So what is really the problem with her being compelled to write a book about her own individual experiences she's gained by identifying with being a, "Black Woman"??? Honestly, I would have felt the same as everybody else if this was 4 or 5 years ago. But I wasn't exposed to Moorish-American teachings at that time as well. So here is my assessment of the situation behind Mrs. Dolezal.
According to my current progress on Moorish Studies, the demographic terms, "White" and "Black" are Denotative Legal Statuses and Misnomers (i.e. Black's Law Dictionary Series). And what is a "Person" in the eyes of the law??? Hmmm????? The case of Mostafa Hefny is quite a great example of the reality of what the U.S. Corporate De-Facto government KNOWS about what White, Black, and Person REALLY MEANS. Of course, any given word can have multiple Contextual Connotative connections via our accepted Modern Colloquial Matrix used by any and everybody at any given time for basic communicative sake. But at the end of it all, just because a word or a phrase is widely accepted as is, doesn't make it the Denotative End; or more specifically, it's "etymology" (a.k.a. Root). Identification and Classification isn't the SAME THING; nor can it, or rather it SHOULDN'T be used outside the framework of the word, "STATUS". Status alone SUPREMELY validates Identification and Classification ONLY when a person or Natural Being can "prove" WHO and/or WHAT they say they are or "proclaim" to be. This is a definite legal requirement in lawful and unlawful proceedings; and should be the standard for all forms of identifying one self to any individual and/or group. But folks are originally emotional for all of the WRONG reasons. But is Mrs. Dolezal's position on the matter really appropriate for her being, in it's TRUE DENOTATIVE sense, a Caucasian??? Let's look at that for a lil bit.......
Historically Speaking, many Aboriginal/Indigenous Autochthonous people; along with Caucasians, have walked the thin line between the social construct known as race; as well as the perception of race we hold dear. As a matter of fact, NPR did a story about that some months back. It's was really eye opening. But there have been well-documented accounts of similar situations in history (THE SHORT BUT INTRIGUING HISTORY OF WHITE AMERICANS PRETENDING TO BE BLACK). But if she was really serious about identifying with so-called "Black folks", maybe she should have a look at her own DNA to see if she has any ancestors of high melanin content contained in her genealogy. Even the "One Drop Rule" has validity to the strength of so-called black folk blood in contrast to Caucasian blood. It takes a multitude of generations for High Melinated Beings bloodline to be phased out to Caucasian blood. BUT it only takes ONE TIME for Caucasian blood to be phased out because the DOMINANT phenotype features will show itself in the children (i.e. darker skin, "semi-perfect" hair, eyes, nose, etc). It's that simple.
So hopefully whatever you get from this will make something move in your brains and begin to NOT look at words so childishly. She has the right to identify with whatever she chooses. As long as she can explain her reasoning, identifying idealistically as a so-called black woman working for the NAACP shouldn't be such of a problem. We are NOT a race of crayons. But if she's doing good by her self-identification as a so-called black woman..............
